The Jarndyce Blog
Politics, PR and hack philosophy from A Guy Called Donald. But definitely no blogging. Probably.
 

23.8.05

Literally, to pastures new (for now)

I'm deserting you all until September 3rd, I'm afraid. Leaving in a few hours to drive through the night to here. The CD-Rs are burned, the Coke's on drip-feed, the shades are packed and the Mr. Kipling cakes are positioned within reach of the drving seat. I'm all set.

My two-year old is there right now, so I can look forward to ten days of chasing Teletubbies round the garden with water-bombs, and a cow-fight thrown in for local interest if I get the chance. Bliss.

Til then, arrivederci.


posted by Jarndyce @ 15:57
4 comments | links to this post


Bangladesh bombs, foreign roots

First, to London (via):
The government yesterday arrested former [Muslim QUANGO] Islamic Foundation director Moulana Fariduddin Masud, off-loading him from an Emirates flight at Zia International Airport on suspicion of his links to an Islamist militant network. Sources in the law enforcement agencies said he is suspected to have a connection with the August 17 blasts.

Masud, who was on the way to London, was arrested at around 10:00am by the Immigration Police under high-level government instruction.
...
According to his former colleagues, Masud has been a mysterious character but he is reputed as an Islamic scholar who owns a NGO, a hospital, an Islamic School and a madrasa.

"We heard that he has wide international connections. He received funds from the Middle East, and the UK to run these enterprises," said one of his former colleagues.


Masud is also a graduate of the madrassa at Deoband.

Second, to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait:
From the available reports, the indications are that the act was masterminded by, and carried out under the supervision of, the banned extremist Islamic organization Jamaatul Mujahideen. They also point the finger at the organization’s leader, Abdur Rahman, as being the mastermind behind the entire dastardly deed. According to several accounts, Rahman, after having gone to Saudi Arabia for higher studies, subsequently had a stint in Afghanistan during the Soviet occupation of that country, and then returned to Bangladesh. At one point he came into contact with the currently banned (both in Bangladesh and in its home country Saudi Arabia) Islamic NGO al-Harmain Islamic Foundation and the Kuwait-based Islamic Heritage Society who had been functioning in Bangladesh. It needs to be pointed out that al-Harmain has been outlawed as a part of the global war on terror because of its connection with Islamic terrorist organizations. Rahman then joined the rigorously fundamentalist Ahle Hadis Movement and from there, almost as a natural progression, made the short leap to terrorist activities.


Finally, to unidentified "foreigners", at least some of whom sound Pakistani:
The intelligence agencies have prepared a list of nine foreigners believed to have links with the local Jamaatul Mujahedin adherents, who allegedly carried out the serial bomb blasts on August 17.
...
"The suspected foreigners have stayed at different hotels this month and most of them left the hotels by August 16," sources added.

The suspected are: Maolana Nur Ahmed, Maolana Yasin, Hafez Monir Hossain, Touhid Wahab, Mehbub Noor, Zoinuddin Khan, Ahmed Abdullah, Ahmed Shah Bin Sharif and Ahmed Shah Noor-e Islam.


Background here and here.


posted by Jarndyce @ 09:56
0 comments | links to this post


22.8.05

SB autumn chic

Suicide Bomber 1: All praises be to Allah and all salutations and prayers be for Muhammad. Today I, a proud mujahid, take the battle to the kufr democrats of the Zionist-Crusader alliance. InshAllah, their city will be burning with fear and panic in the east and the west, and the north and the south. Beat that, brother.

Suicide Bomber 2: Ah yes, all that. Plus, when I explode, I'll be wearing my Freedom Bag. Hah.


posted by Jarndyce @ 15:20
0 comments | links to this post


Tavistock Square redux

I took a walk through Tavistock Square on Saturday, for the first time since 7th July. I'd had a few, in daylight hours, in Covent Garden and was heading for Euston Road to catch the 30 home. I had forgotten, for one, how damn quiet it is around there at weekends. Even more so with the students gone. When I passed the spot, I couldn't see another person in the square, or hear a close-by sound. I felt a bit tearful, but that might have been the Guinness.

Anyway, it was only then that I realised the bomb had detonated on London's great divide: a direct north–south line that hardly wanders or deviates from Aldwych in the south to Hampstead High Street in the north, skirting Somerstown and skewering Camden, Chalk Farm and Belsize Park on the way up. It splits the city in half: an ancient line that divides London to the east from the defunct city of Westminster, to the west. Despite the addition of SoSho to soften the seriousness, most Londoners still cross to Westminster to get all decadent and frivolous.

When Hasib Hussein exploded his bomb on the 7th, he wasn't just breaking 13 hearts. He was cracking the city along a fault-line. They've patched up the hole: the pavement's scrubbed, the Portland stone of the BMA building looks newly quarried. The blood has been wiped off the plaque that should read: Charles Dickens' "dirty, dismal, dilapidated mansion" stood here. Soon they'll repair the shattered wooden door, so it won't look like a rhino had one charge and gave up. They'll paint over the bits where the blue emulsion has been ripped from the veneer. The contract street-cleaners will sweep the flowers away. And Tavistock Square will be left in peace, content in its status as a cut-through for drunks stumbling home on a Saturday evening.


posted by Jarndyce @ 13:43
0 comments | links to this post


20.8.05

Bangladesh reaction

Rezwan has collected reactions to the Bangladesh bombs here. This backgrounder is especially good:
Jama'atul Mujahideen first came into focus on February 13 when seven bombs exploded at one of its hideouts in the Chhoto Gurgola area of Dinajpur town while its cadres were making bombs. Later it was found that this group had planned to set off blasts in different towns in northern Bangladesh. Two arms and explosives cases were filed and seven were arrested. But all of them were released later.

In August 2003, cadres of the JMB along with its top leaders Bangla Bhai and Shaikh Abdur Rahman were locked in a clash at a secret training camp with the police at Khetlal of Joypurhat. Most of the militants managed to escape leaving behind huge documents showing their subversive plans. Eighteen militants were arrested, including Rahman's brother. But a few days later, they were not only released, but the government transferred several police officials involved in the Khetlal operation.

Oh dear: a depressing re-run of Bhutto-era Pakistan...
Islamic extremists, who were once hated in Bangladesh, have been gathering force for over a decade and half. They have not only increased their cadre strength but also gained political legitimacy by being part of the government. They are important constituent of the present ruling coalition. But being in government has not taken them away from their violent or extremist activities. The increasing strength of Islamists in Bangladesh has caused concern among the international community. But the leading party in ruling coalition, Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has always tried to underplay the existence of Islamists in the country. However, the latest series of blasts flies in the face of this claim. Islamists through these blasts, actually displayed their strength and countrywide network, which the BNP has been always more than eager to deny.

The full text of the leaflet left by the JMB at some of the bomb sites is also worth a read in full.


posted by Jarndyce @ 09:51
0 comments | links to this post


18.8.05

Bangladesh? Never heard of it

If I told you there was a country, a former British colony, where 400 bombs could go off in one day, and it not even make the news here, what would you say? That I was a prime candidate to be shipped off to Samizdata? Well, it happened yesterday in Bangladesh:
Hundreds of bomb blasts across Bangladesh on Wednesday have triggered fresh concerns that one of the world's poorest countries is nearing a tipping point in the advance of militant Islamic fundamentalism into the mainstream of the nation's social and political life.

Around midday on Wednesday, more than 300 crude bombs exploded nationwide, officials said, targeting symbols of public life: government buildings, courthouses and press clubs for journalists. The attacks were fastidiously planned, with hundreds of strikes condensed into a half-hour and spread across 63 of the country's 64 districts.

Only two people were killed: is that it, not enough victim-porn for us? Anyway, a classic systems strike aimed to maximise disruption and publicity, but minimise killing. Hardly consolation for the family of Rabiul Alam, who I'm betting can't afford to lose a breadwinner. Or the mother of the murdered ten-year-old boy.

Scarcely believable, in the dog days of the GWOT, that this hasn't made even a British ripple, outside Tower Hamlets. Time to wake up, democrats: there's an Islamist uprising against fragile democracy going on. From the leaflet left by insurgent group, Jamatul Mujahideen Bangladesh at some of the bomb sites:
Because the process under which the head of the state or other rulers are elected is totally anti-Islamic. The Quran or Hadis do not recognize any democratic or socialist system that is enacted by infidels and non-believers. These systems are in direct contravention of Allah’s laws. The laws of the land are the brain-children of infidels, non-believers and Jews precisely to destroy Muslim mores and faith.
...
This is the third call of JM for Islamic rule in Bangladesh. This time if the government does not establish Islamic rule and instead arrest Muslims for seeking Allah’s laws and suppresses ulemas (learned in religion) the JM will go into action against concerned people and authorities.
...
Allah’s soldiers will not allow this wish to be fulfilled, nor will they allow the success of the infidel concept of democracy. Democracy is a Tagut [secular] invention and the most important weapon for establishing Tagut rule. Those who seek to establish Tagut rule are terrorists and militants.

More succinctly:
The Bangladeshi chapter of the ‘Let’s murder our way to Paradise’ gang of religious fascists have been at it again.

How did extreme Sunni Islam move to Bangladesh? Perhaps via returning migrant labourers from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the rest of the Gulf? No doubt with a little help from outsiders: Pakistanis, Arab Wahhabi imperialists, the usual suspects. They'll surely find fertile ground: GDP per capita is just $2,000 p.a, unemployment is around 40%. Human rights are a disaster:
...politics remains confrontational and marked by frequent strikes and street demonstrations. This problem contributes substantially to the deterioration of law and order, with thousands killed, injured, or arrested every year in politically motivated activities. Human rights abuses are common, and extrajudicial killings, torture, and unwarranted lethal force by government forces continue.

According to Freedom House:
... endemic corruption, a weak rule of law, limited bureaucratic transparency, and political polarization for undermining government accountability. In October, Transparency International again listed Bangladesh at the bottom of a 146country list on its 2004 Corruption Perceptions Index and noted that corruption was perceived to be “acute.”
...
Islam is the official religion. Hindus, Christians, and other minorities have the right to worship freely but face societal discrimination and remain under-represented in government employment. Violence against the Hindu minority flared up after the 2001 elections, when BNP supporters attacked Hindus because of their perceived support for the rival AL party. Atrocities, including murder, rape, destruction of property, and kidnapping, forced hundreds of Hindus from their homes, some across the border into India. Hindus continue to face harassment and violence at the hands of orthodox Islamist political parties and their supporters. During the year, the 100,000strong Ahmadiya Muslim sect also faced increased attacks from Islamist groups

Imtiaz and Rezwan have the best local analysis.


posted by Jarndyce @ 22:58
4 comments | links to this post


Sun, sand and, er, Saudi Arabia

Fancy a holiday in the Magic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? Thought not. Given the choice, I'd take my chances in Kashmir or Aceh. The Religious Policeman plays Judith Chalmers with the Saudi Tourism Minister:
M[inister]: [Visitors will] be able to get visas on arrival at the airport, just like Dubai.

RP: So anyone can fly into Riyadh or Jeddah and just pick up a visa at the airport?

M: Men can, certainly, and married couples, as long as they can prove they're married, so they'll need to bring a Marriage Certificate, four copies translated into Arabic and certified by a lawyer. Not a Jewish lawyer, naturally. Women, on the other hand, will need to be sponsored by someone inside Saudi Arabia.
...
RP: And what about couples who aren't married, or gay couples?

M: Well as you know, we behead homosexuals, and stone adulterous or loose women to death, so it's probably best if we don't let them in in the first place, otherwise there'll be no end of paperwork.
...
RP: Can they sit under a sunshade and have a drink, like in Dubai?

M: Certainly not, and if there's any drink in their suitcase, they'll go to prison.
...
RP: So they can go and look round the famous mosques, like they can in Bahrain for example?

M: Well they can certainly look at the outside.

RP: But not the inside? After all, that's where they'd see the beautiful decorations, get a sense of stillness and reverence.

M Oh no, if they go inside we'll put them in prison.

RP: And of course they can't go and visit the spiritual center of Islam, Makkah, or historic Madinah?

M: If we ever found them there they'd certainly go to prison, unless they were lynched first.
...
RP: And can the women go topless?

M Certainly not. They must keep their heads covered at all times.

Read it all.


posted by Jarndyce @ 19:10
0 comments | links to this post


My own little Islamic republic

Someone real* actually wrote this:
Like other countries around the world, we hit the wall when we started letting Islamics in. They are deeply alien, hostile and expectant of being treated with special consideration from the start, in every country in which they have been allowed in. My heart goes out to the British and Europeans who are forced by their economic circumstances, to live in their ghettoes.

Admittedly, someone mad. Are there people out there (people who don't live on Mexican haciendas and can no longer distinguish NuLabour from Zanu-PF) who really feel sorry for me living and raising a young (white) family in the Islamic Republic of Dalston? You don't know what you're missing:
1. The best Turkish food outside Istanbul.
2. Nigerian-brewed Guinness in the shops.
3. NHS dentists without waiting lists.
4. The call to prayer.
5. The second-best street market in London, with the best five minutes away.
6. Three-bedroom houses for under £200,000.
7. The bagel bakery right opposite the mosque.
8. A different playground for every day of the week.
9. London's best local museums, and the best kids' museum nearby.
10. The best dim sum outside Chinatown.
11. Places to buy kebabs on Christmas Day.
12. A street called Shakspeare Walk. (read it again...)
13. Two proper chippys.
14. A Kurdish street protest every week.
15. The city farm.
Come and see us sometime. Burqa** optional.

* Though I'm still not 100% sure she's not a fantastic parody.

** In fact most of the Muslims round here are Turks, Kurds or Somalis, so you rarely see a burqa.


posted by Jarndyce @ 14:50
8 comments | links to this post


Another Muslim democracy by the end of 2005

Okay, a small one: The Maldives. Acorns, oak trees and the like. From the Bangkok Post:
The government will stick to an original schedule to have a fully-fledged democratic system in the nation of 300,000 before the end of 2005, the 41-year-old minister said in Colombo.

"It is not just a multi-party system we are talking about, but an electoral system, a judiciary and a media that will also go with that,'' [Foreign Minister] Mr Shaheed said.

He said the government had secured the support of two European experts to set up an electoral system for the former British protectorate which for the first time wants to conduct multi-party parliamentary elections.

The nation of Sunni Muslims will also for the first time have independent commissions to run the civil service, the judiciary and to conduct elections, while there will also be an independent press complaints commission, he said.


posted by Jarndyce @ 09:23
0 comments | links to this post


17.8.05

On squabbling liberals

An argumentative little number today from me at The Sharpener. Not to be missed...


posted by Jarndyce @ 11:22
0 comments | links to this post


16.8.05

Are comment box trolls all on drugs?

So, it isn't just bloggers who attract batshit-crazy commenters — proper companies like this one do, too. From one of their recent global strategy reports:
As often happens, our readers... have lambasted us. Critics of the [Iraq] war have accused us of pimping for the Bush administration for daring to imply that the war was anything but a total and catastrophic failure. Supporters of the war wrote to condemn us for even imagining that al Qaeda might consist of people who actually think and plan things, rather than of raving psychotics seeking slaughter because they feel like it. One e-mail said the war is the result of George W. Bush's unresolved Oedipal conflicts. Another said that we were naïve in assuming that all Muslims were not deranged killers. Discussions of the war have never been elevated, but they have now degenerated to a Warner Brothers' cartoon — with Sylvester, Tweety, Elmer and Bugs all cranked up on speed and self-righteousness.


posted by Jarndyce @ 16:56
1 comments | links to this post


Musical interlude: Arctic Monkeys

As a rule, I don't do advice. I'm not an agony aunt. But I'm gonna transgress this once: you'll be doing yourself a favour with a quick interweb trawl for this band. Essential muso analogy: they're The Coral with better lyrics meets Pulp with better tunes meets Kasabian without the beats meets Peter Kay and Mike Skinner taking their electric guitars to mod night in Sheffield. Got that?

No single or album yet (end 2005 / start 2006), but the demo I've been passed has eight tracks, all sloshing about somewhere. There's a tour right now, but you'll have to commit larceny to get a ticket (and if you do, not that I'm going in for incitement, can you rob me one too?).

I'm pretty sure you don't have to have spent too much late-teen time hanging round the wrong sort of Yorkshire clubs to find this funny:
He talks of San Francisco, he's from Hunter's Bar
I don't quite know the distance
But I'm sure that's far
Yeah I'm sure that's pretty far

And yeah, I'd love to tell you all my problem:
You're not from New York City, you're from Rotherham
So get off the bandwagon, and put down the handbook

Fake Tales of San Francisco

Normal service back tomorrow.


posted by Jarndyce @ 14:40
0 comments | links to this post


15.8.05

Wish you were here, Omar Bakri Mohammed

I happen to think that we shouldn't be deporting people to face torture elsewhere. Whatever they are accused of. Even complete knobheads. Even if they've been found guilty of something nasty. There you go: a simple (simplistic?) liberal position.

But for the Tottenham Ayatollah, I have zero sympathy. Yusuf explains why:
His decision to leave the country for Lebanon, where he holds citizenship, demonstrated that his claim of refugee status in any case has no merit. If you fear persecution in a country, you don’t go there for a holiday or to see Mama...

Good riddance to him. In this book, Omar Bakri refers to himself as laughable and a harmless clown. That may be true. At the very least, he's been unwise in his choice of travel agent.


posted by Jarndyce @ 16:34
3 comments | links to this post


14.8.05

You want Hizb?

Every day or two, someone Googles a modest, short piece I wrote in March about the involvement of Hizb-ut-Tahrir in the 'Sister' Shabina Begum case. Curiously, their role was missed by just about every major media outlet at the time (often re-inserted in retrospective pieces, though). Well, if it's potted Hizb you want, try this from David T of Harry's Place (better still: he's writing at openDemocracy, so you don't have to endure the tossers in the comments boxes). You really ought to know this stuff:
It is true to say that Hizb-ut-Tahrir, as presently constituted, does not actively solicit the murder of civilians in Britain. Those who have been most closely linked to terrorism are its former, rather than its present, members. Therefore, the spokesman who declares "our work is totally non-violent" is telling the truth.

The party does, however, teach a politics which seeks to establish a theocracy, and which understands history as a Manichean struggle between Islam and unbelief which will ultimately result in a "bloody struggle". In that sense, it has close similarities with other totalitarian movements.
...
Merely because Hizb-ut-Tahrir presents itself as a religious-political movement does not mean that it should be held to a different, lower, standard than its secular counterparts. Other racist and totalitarian parties of the far right are not given a free pass by the media, nor do they see their true nature finessed by a secular left hungry for allies. Hizb-ut-Tahrir has spent a great deal of time and effort sanitising the public face of its politics. In that sense, it has followed the same path as the British National Party. But people are not fooled by extremists simply because they wear smart clothes and speak in measured tones. They should not be taken in by Hizb-ut-Tahrir.

In full.


posted by Jarndyce @ 13:25
2 comments | links to this post


12.8.05

All just a little bit of history repeated

Evidence against a progressive theory of history:

1. If she floats, she's a witch. (1450)

2. If he says he believes in a democratic Britain, he's lying. (2005)

Unmask their dissembling ways! Suspend the presumption of innocence lest Western civilisation should fall. Clampdown, the rules of the game have changed.

Relatedly, for those with four hours to spare and a taste for puerile debate, read the comments to discover why I'm a useful idiot, wilfully obtuse and an accomplice to Islamism. Or, rather, don't.

Unrelatedly, my daughter is two today. That's yer lot.

UPDATE: Having given it some thought, I quite like the new abuse. I'll add it to the list: fucking neocon, Tory loon, Commie shit, warmonger. Ah, the joys of being wilfully obtuse.


posted by Jarndyce @ 10:06
0 comments | links to this post


11.8.05

Are we losing in Iraq?

Yes, with new democracies you can expect a birth pang or two. But this one seems to have been in almost fruitless labour for longer than Davina McCall and Carol Smilie combined.

In One
Baghdad mayor 'ousted by gunmen' (no, not in a recall plebiscite).

In Two
Jim Talib, a US soldier who took part in the attack on Falluja, describes his experience: "On one of my trips to drop off a detainee at [Abu Ghraib], the senior interrogator told us not to bring them in any more. ‘Just shoot them,’ he said. I was stunned, I couldn’t believe he ­actually said it. He was not joking around, he was giving us a directive. A few days later a group of Humvees from ­another unit passed by one of our machine gun positions, and they had the bodies of two dead Iraqis strapped to their hoods like a couple of deer. One of the bodies had exposed brain matter that had ­begun to cook on the hood of the vehicle, it was a gruesome, medieval display. So much of what I ­experienced seemed out of control, I saw so little respect for the living and almost none for the dead, and there was almost no ­accountability".

In Three
Where is the democracy that our awesome firepower was supposed to have given the Iraqi people? The British in Basra have sacrificed it in the name of a dubious stability. Last year, radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr was a dangerous bogeyman according to the coalition. ... Now – if reports are to be believed – al-Sadr’s men control large parts of Basra with British acquiescence.

In Four
The Good News from Iraq has gone into retirement.

So, I'm wondering: is this why Iran has chosen now to up the stakes at Isfahan (where this guy lived)? There's no way (well, there's one way) we can even attempt to control them, too. They're a damned smart bunch, those Persians.


posted by Jarndyce @ 10:40
0 comments | links to this post


10.8.05

Osama, chief of police

Given that the job of a terrorist is to spread terror, killing being of instrumental not intrinsic value in the process, should we now label City of London Police Commissioner James Hart with his proper T-moniker? And the Financial Times as propagandists and accomplices to terror?


posted by Jarndyce @ 12:30
0 comments | links to this post


Singapore rights update

Regular readers might recall that I wrote (via WriteToThem) to my MP, Diane Abbott, in June about the Prime Minister's upcoming Olympic-lobbying visit to Singapore. The key passage:
I wonder if he [Blair] is aware that the recent Freedom House civil and political rights report for Singapore rated that country substantially less free than Benin, Bolivia and Bangladesh, roughly on a par with Armenia, Bahrain, Burkina Faso, Congo and Kuwait. All these countries have serious human rights problems, as I'm sure you know.
...
According to Amnesty, the tiny city-state has executed 420 people since 1991, the highest per capita execution rate in the world... Civic rights have actually waned in the last decade
...
Perhaps you could suggest to him that he raises these matters during his visit?

Well, I finally received a reply, and I'm a little disappointed. It has 'brush-off' written all over it:
Dear xxxx

Thank you for writing to me about the Prime Minister's recent visit to Singapore. You are quite right about their appalling human rights records [sic], and I only hope that he raised these matters with the Prime Minister of Singapore when he was there.

Yours sincerely

pp. Diane Abbott MP

pp? Piss poor.


posted by Jarndyce @ 10:47
3 comments | links to this post


9.8.05

Nosemonkey's morals and Nagasaki Day

I've been away for a while, so I'm jumping into this scrap a bit late... but it seems Nosemonkey has been getting roasted (in the non-footballer sense) by the Pedant General (and again) and Devil's Kitchen (and both again in the comments here). The charges: moral equivalence (and/or, curiously, moral relativism) and naivety over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Fittingly on the 60th Nagasaki Day, I'll deal first with Hiroshima. In defence of the bomb, Devil's Kitchen cites a founding principle of the law of war:
That wars should be brought to an end as quickly as possible

Fair enough. Less than a week after Nagasaki, Japan surrendered. But what about the law concerning the conduct of warfare, specifically the prohibition on deliberately attacking civilians? There's a conflict here not easily resolved by resort to law. DK has a ready-made answer:
They [people of Hiroshima] were civilians, in that they were not in army uniform. However, they were civilians who were working, in industrial cities, to support their army, who was at war (with a number of nations) and could therefore be justified as military targets.

These civilians were, in effect, "soldiers" out of uniform, in service of the national (militarist-expansionist) war effort. Unfortunately, this is exactly what Hamas says in defence of suicide bus bombings in Tel Aviv. It's no truer for them than it was for Truman. It won't do as a justification for killing schoolchildren.

Second, the accusations of moral equivalence. Specifically, on the claim that Nosemonkey equated Bush-Truman with binLaden-Tojo: he doesn't.
I... am fully aware of the difference between western democracy and fascism... The question is not about the relative moral worth of the people using the tactics - it's about the tactics themselves, an end/means thing.

This is a straightforward denial of relativism. Nosemonkey believes the killing itself is wrong. It is incumbent on the killer (or orderer of the killing) to provide justification. This applies whether the killings were ordered by Democrat or despot.

And there is a crucial equivalance between Hiroshima and the London bombings (of 1940 or 2005 vintage): both involved the deliberate targeting of civilians for political-military purposes. There is no reasonable deontological theory that judges any of these acts "morally right". To justify them, moral appeals need go beyond the act to entail teleology: ends/means, goal-orientation, and so on. It may be right that international law gives states rights (to declare war, to kill legally) that non-states (like al-Qaeda) don't have. But morally this isn't enough, and still doesn't answer Nosemonkey's central question:
The question is not about the relative moral worth of the people using the tactics - it's about the tactics themselves... How many deaths does it take before it becomes unacceptable?

It isn't even enough to state, as the Pedant General does, that states are not moral in the same way as individuals. Decisions of state are made by leaders, who are moral agents. Their actions still have to be justified. So, we're not judging the the US, but President Harry S Truman. It matters not a jot.

The answer perhaps lies in a simple cost-benefit analysis: Would a land invasion of Japan have killed more than the two atomic bombs? Would an invasion have even been necessary? Was Japan on the point of surrender before Hiroshima? Or after? Was Nagasaki too soon after Hiroshima? Were the bombs aimed, by proxy, at Stalin? In other words, there is no answer to be found in morality. So, back to context, history and disagreement.


posted by Jarndyce @ 12:09
16 comments | links to this post


8.8.05

Two ends of a very long road

There is a long and very concrete link between London, where I live, and northern Wales, where I just had a week's holiday: Thomas Telford's London–Holyhead turnpike, once Roman Watling Street, now the accursed A5. At one end of this umbilical, Mohammad Sidique Khan and his mate Shahzad spent a weekend in Canolfan Tryweryn, rafting the rapids that tumble from Snowdonia. At the other, Mohammad killed himself and six others, and maimed more, at Edgware Road tube station, on July 7th, 2005.

This flying visit from the Beeston bombers is as close as Gwynedd is ever going to come to suicide murderers. There will never be Islamist terror in Betwys-y-Coed or martyrdom operations on the Llyn Peninsula. So, a question: why should the people of northern Wales give a shit about events that happen hundreds of miles away in London, or even further in the Middle East? Distant, irrelevant events that will never affect them directly?

But they do. And that they do suggests the beginnings of a solution: the revival of an inclusive and exclusive idea of Britain. The reinvigoration of a shared citizenship. Practically: the end of "separate but equal" religious schooling; the death of "neutral cultural and linguistic recognition" by the state; the hope and expectation that the thousands who come to live here learn our language, and subscribe at a minimal level to liberal democracy. Further, the end of monarchy and subjecthood allowing the birth of British citizenship.

It also means sticking to locking people up for what they do, not what they think or say. And the continuation of religious tolerance, including tolerance of those who prefer to be intolerant.

I haven't read a paper, watched a news bulletin or surfed the interweb for ten days. Nobody has tried to blow me up for over two weeks. My head is empty — it's bliss. I will plug in and write again soon. For better or worse, I'm back.


posted by Jarndyce @ 10:48
0 comments | links to this post


contact

fairvote@gmail.com

recent posts


archives


resources


links


july 7


stuff




Subscribe with Bloglines

British Blogs.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?