![]() |
|
| Politics, PR and hack philosophy from A Guy Called Donald. But definitely no blogging. Probably. | |
21.3.06This soritical Blair governmentRevealed: Blair's secret role in loans scandal:Evidence linking Tony Blair personally to the £14 million "loans for peerages" scandal engulfing Labour can be revealed today. The Rod Aldridge loan should bring Blair down: Today it was revealed that Rod Aldridge "loaned" Labour £1 million. Naturally enough, this was "in a private capacity". But come on... The chairman of a company whose entire success relies on big government contracts (funded by the taxpayer, lest we forget) bungs the government a million quid out of his own pocket (a million quid earned thanks to the big government contracts funded by the taxpayer and other, private sector contracts earned in part thanks to its high-profile government links) and there's nothing dodgy going on? The antidote has turned poison. This vacuous NuLabour project hoisted by its own hypocritical petard. Perhaps Blair, faced with the essentially vague accusation of sleaze, is relying on the sorites defence: no one grain of wheat makes the difference between there being and not being a heap of wheat. Given that one grain of wheat doesn't make a heap, it follows that two do not, thus three do not, and so on. In the end it seems that no amount of wheat can make a heap: a paradox that stumps the smartest logicians. So, one paltry Ecclestone doesn't make for corrupt government. Neither does a Hinduja. Neither do a couple of careless signatures over the pains au chocolat. Neither does a little help for your friends. Nor a good day to bury bad news. Nor a few convenient gaps in the memory. And so on. And on. And on. Not one adds up to corruption, so how can two, or three, or four? But there's a problem with the sorites paradox: at some point there's an unmistakeable heap of wheat, and this one's long gone rancid. Like everything else in Blairworld, the puny case for the defence is just semantics. Update 22/3: As if by magic, the sorites defence appears.
posted by Jarndyce @ 12:03
Comments:
Does this mean you're back with us again rather than just commenting everywhere?
Post a Comment
I reckon Tony's out with this one. Which conference will he announce at? # posted by MatGB @ 01:57 Links to this post: << Home |
contactfairvote@gmail.comrecent postsarchives
resources
linksjuly 7
stuff![]() ![]() |